In my daily search for an “On This Day in History” post, I ran across something rather interesting. On all of the normal sites that I peruse through in hopes to find something unique, I ran across an event. This event did not seem special, not to me anyways.
1904: New York CIty. A woman is arrested for smoking a cigarette in an automobile. “You can’t do that on Fifth Avenue,” the arresting officer says.
And there it is. On this day (Sept 28th), in 1904, a woman was arrested for “smoking a cigarette in an automobile.” Just out of curiosity I decided to look further into this seemingly historically significant event.
To make it on everyone’s On This Day in History, it must be, right?
I don’t know, you tell me. I spent the better part of an hour searching online to find ANYTHING out about this mysterious woman. All I could find was: “1904: New York City. A woman is arrested for smoking a cigarette in an automobile. “You can’t do that on Fifth Avenue,” the arresting officer says.” Over and over, site after site. It wasn’t just as if she was arrested and that was that. There is a direct quote from the arresting officer. So my question is this….
Assuming that I haven’t lost my mind and just can’t find the story or a reference to a primary source on this–which is possible–why is this on everyone’s list? Here is an item that I cannot prove, but I am writing about it. Is this just an urban legend or a myth? I would be grateful if someone could give me some information regarding this mysterious arrest.
Now that my 2:00 a.m. sleep-deprived rant is over, we can get on with the real point.
Over one-hundred years ago, a woman was arrested for smoking on a particular street. (Also in 1904, a woman in New York was sentenced to serve thirty days in jail for smoking around her kids.) Fifty years later, however, the same woman–well probably not the same woman…cause she would be old–would have been sexy and widely accepted for lighting up a cigarette in public. Fast-forward another fifty years and smoking is again all but banned. How did this happen? This is one of those backwards history moments that spits in George Santayana’s philosophy. In fact, repeating this particular event might keep the human race from becoming annihilated, or in Santayana’s words “condemned.”
I wonder how often this happens?
People are always quick to throw up phrases like ‘foreshadowing events’ and ‘hindsight is 20/20,’ but are there any particular words to exclaim when repeating history is good?
Let me know what you think. Can you think of an examples in history where we repeated a lifestyle or choice that was once abolished or deemed unnecessary?
Latest posts by Grant Oster (see all)
- Today in History, June 18th! - June 18, 2013
- The Radio Priest and His Antisemitic, Political Preachings - June 17, 2013
- Copperhead The Movie - June 14, 2013