A few of the great historical events that happened today in history, December 22nd!
Victor Davis Hanson, a historian at Stanford University, published an article today entitled Can’t analyze history as it unfolds. In it he discusses current American struggles (specifically dealing with Syria and WMD), and how it is too soon to speculate–for historical purposes. Below is the conclusion of his article.
The moral of the story is that history cannot be written as it unfolds. In the case of Iraq, we still don’t know the full story of Saddam’s WMD, the grand strategic effects of the Iraq war, the ripples from the creation of the Iraq republic, or the relative degree of incompetence of any American administration at war in the Middle East — and we won’t for many years to come.
In reading, Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong (Second Edition) by: James Loewen, the author gives textbook authors and publishers a hard time for not properly covering current history in high school textbooks. While he focuses more on the possibility of offending others (those still alive to remember the events), I think it is important to consider the lasting effects of misunderstood “facts”. As the human race is not one of total omniscience, I think a certain time-frame should be established before the “history of” a particular event or person is published. Just imagine–my generation is still in shock that Christopher Columbus didn’t first find the New World and that Pluto isn’t a planet. The truths of Christopher Columbus and Pluto have been evident for a while, but it is hard to refute published works that have been around for decades. I think it is important to remember that an improper analysis of history–especially once published in print–is hard to erase. While everyone is quick to condemn, point blame, and predict how a current event will unfold, it is important to realize that it cannot be done.
For those of you who haven’t voted on my poll: Which History to Take?, please take the time to go vote. Thanks!
To those of you who want to follow you can subscribe via: WordPress Follow, Email, Twitter, and Facebook! Check that all out on the right hand side.
As I narrow down my class selection for the fall, I am taking this time to receive input from you guys. I need one more slot filled and the only class requirement is that the class must be “not of United States or European history”. Be warned, whichever class I take, could possibly and will probably contribute to some of the articles published on this site. That being said, let me know what you would like to hear about by selecting a class listed in the poll below.
If you have any particular reason as to why you selected what you did, let me know about it in the comments below! I would love to hear what I could stand to learn from each of these classes.
Thanks for your input!
The wedding ring has a surprisingly deeper history than I had originally expected. As my anniversary is today, I feel that it is only fitting to cover the history of the wedding ring. I don’t generally do “This Day in History” post, but this is a personal one. This day in history, in 2008, my wife and I got our own tiny pair of handcuffs that would bind us together for life. I mean…..–and now, the history of wedding rings!
The history of the wedding ring is an extensive one going back 4000 years to the times of Ancient Egypt. While the first use of these symbolic rings is not documented, there is proof that rings, made of reed and hemp, were worn by Egyptians to signify the wearers’ supernatural belief that they were to be united in a marriage of endless love. Just as a ring doesn’t have an end, neither does their eternal love. (In case you did not pick up on that imagery…) The largest contribution that Egyptians gave to the custom of wedding rings is the placement of the ring. The Egyptians believed that there was a vein that ran directly from the third finger—this excludes the thumb—of the left hand, straight to the heart. As the heart symbolized love and passion, what better place to wear such a symbolic ring?
It would be several thousand years before the custom of the wedding ring would spread further than Egypt. In 332 BCE, Alexander the Great would take not only Egypt, but also their ideology of wedding rings and the anatomical explanation that the index finger in-cased a vein that led directly to the heart. This practice and knowledge would be taken back to Greece and was eventually picked up by the Romans.
While wedding rings were started by Ancient Egyptians, it would be the Romans that started the actual custom that every wife would be bestowed a ring to signify “marriage”. I put marriage in quotation marks because some (mainly the wealth and upper-class) Romans had a less endearing outlook on marriage and the symbolism of the wedding ring. While it did continue to signify eternal and never-ending, it wasn’t love they spoke of, per se. In some circles, a wedding ring in Roman culture signified ownership. Not all women of this era had rights when it came to marriage. Some daughters had no voice in who they married and proposals were not in existence. An interested party merely showed a good gesture to the father (basically buying her hand in marriage) and the two would be wed. At this point, a wedding ring was placed on the woman’s hand to signify a binding, legal agreement; ownership. The ring, usually constructed of iron, ironically was still placed on the third finger of the left hand on the vena amoris (Latin for the previously mentioned vein that was thought to have led to the heart).
As times changed, so did the customs and rings themselves. Rings previously made of iron, that would easily rust, were replaced with rings made of silver and gold. During the 1500’s, Henry the VIII made a major contribution to keeping the ring on the index finger. (This is important since the science behind vena amoris would turn out to be incorrect.) Because of Henry the VIII, in traditional English weddings, the wedding ring would be placed on the bride’s thumb during the ceremony and the holy Trinity would be recited. Starting with the thumb “In the name of the Father”, then moved to the pointer finger “in the name of the Son”, then the middle “and in the name of the Holy Ghost”, finally to its final resting place (index finger) “Amen”. During this era, gimmal rings also became popularized. The gimmal ring was a betrothal ring. When a couple became engaged, both parties would wear a ring and upon their wedding day the two rings would become one interlocking metal band, which the bride would wear. This customary gesture signified unity in the marriage.
What history would be complete without America trying to complete disturb the normal process and cultural normality of tradition, am I right? Religious beliefs, of early Puritan, American settlers condemned wedding rings. They believed that rings were frivolous and that excess adornment of the body was a sin. As Puritan culture saw adultery as a punishable by death offence, there was no need to wear rings for marital identification purposes. However, the lucky ladies of those times did receive “wedding thimbles”. I mean, how useful and practical, am I right? If only men were more thoughtful these days… It should not go without saying, however, that it wasn’t long before these clever and daring women learned that clipping the top off of a thimble resulted in a ring.
While men started wearing wedding bands in the 1300’s, in the Greek Orthodox religion, it did not pick up immediately elsewhere, especially in the United States. It wasn’t until World War II that men in America started to wear wedding bands. As men faced lengthy amounts of time away from their wives, they began to adorn their own hands with a ring to remind them of what they had waiting for them back home. It stole away from their sense of loneliness and gave them much-needed hope and a reason to live.
As time passes, I fully expect the customs of weddings and its symbolic rings to change. I myself have a two-tone (yellow and white gold) ring, with an inscription inside that reads “My Best Friend 7-26-08”. No matter what the ring is made of, whether hemp, iron, gold, or just a thimble, the rings of past all symbolically stood and will continue to stand for eternal and endless love.
For those of you that don’t follow me on WordPress, email, or Twitter, there is now a Facebook option! Check the right-hand side to see all of your following options.